AUSTRALIA WILL NEED TO REMOVE CO2 FROM AIR TO KEEP WARMING BELOW 2C, CLIMATE BODY SAYS...

2C of global warming would move the world into ‘uncharted territory’, analysis by Climate Analytics found. Photograph: John Giles/PA

 

Climate Institute report says negative-emissions technology is imperative because risks of global temperature reaching 2C are ‘unmanageable’...

Australia will blow its carbon budget with either the Coalition’s emissions reduction targets, or those suggested by the Labor opposition, highlighting the urgent need for negative-emissions technology, analysis commissioned by the Climate Institute shows.

“Everyone is just now beginning to work out the implications of the 1.5C goal, and how hard it is to get to it,” said John Connor, chief executive of the Climate Institute.

The report found that while the policy measures needed to keep global warming to 1.5C or 2C were similar, the risks and costs associated with letting global temperatures reach 2C would be “unmanageable”.

Global warming of 1.5C would make rare events such as extreme heat waves and coral bleaching the new normal, but 2C of warming would move the world into “uncharted territory”, the report by Climate Analytics found.

“Essentially, we are saying that achieving emissions reduction targets will require transformation,” Connor said. “Not achieving them will require even greater transformation as we struggle to cope with the growing climate impacts.”

For Australia to cut its emissions in line with either target, it will almost certainly need to achieve negative emissions towards 2050.

But if the country follows its current targets to 2030 (26% to 28% below 2005 levels) it will then need to make devastating cuts, dropping to zero emissions within five years to stay within the carbon budget.

Even on the plan Labor took the election, which involved a cut to 45% below 2005 levels by 2030 and net zero emissions by 2050, will blow the carbon budget by 15%, the report found.

It said that “some level of negative emissions is virtually unavoidable at this stage, even with very rapid emissions reductions between now and 2050”.

An earlier Climate Institute report, the group found technology such as bioenergy combined with carbon capture and storage could play a role in removing 65m tonnes of CO2 annually by 2050.

The report argues that a carbon-budget approach should be taken by policymakers, rather than simply focusing on an emissions target for a particular year: “Australia’s contribution to limiting warming to 1.5C-2C is determined by cumulative emissions, not emissions in a single year.”

The report noted that decarbonisation of the electricity sector should be the biggest priority, since it is the biggest contributor to emissions. Doing that would also allow emissions in transport and other sectors to be cut by electrifying them.

For the world to achieve the more ambitious 1.5C goal, the strategies would be the same but would just need to occur faster. It said doing it faster would cost between 1.5 times and twice as much, but “the benefits would be vast”.

Warming of 2C would destroy almost all tropical coral around the world, but keeping warming to 1.5C could save 10% of coral cover.

And 2C of warming would increase heatwave days in northern Australia by 60 a year; the lower target would save 20 of those days from such hot weather.

The stronger target would also have dramatic impacts on water availability and sea level rise.

Connor said the government’s review of climate policies, which will occur next year, is an opportunity to create bipartisan support for credible targets. “It will quite possibly be the first credible national climate policy conversation for five years or so,” he said.

For Australia to start moving towards an emissions goal that is consistent with the commitments made in Paris last year, the Climate Institute called for three broad actions.

First, a pathway to zero emissions needed to be designed, and it needed to get Australia to zero emissions well before 2050.

Second, it called for climate and energy policies to be fully integrated so that coal power can be phased out and businesses can invest with confidence in renewable energy.

Finally, it called for Australia to take the lead from business and defence agencies around the world that were integrating climate costs and opportunities into their everyday decision making. That should involve a “national adaptation strategy”, it said.

Tuesday 23 August 2016

source: https://www.theguardian.com/us

original story HERE

 

Get more of The Global Warming Blog. Bookmark this page and sign up for the blog’s free RSS Feed. Sign up for free Global Warming Blog by clicking here. You will automatically be emailed a regular summary of the latest global warming headlines. 
 
To learn about more about global warming, climate change or greenhouse gases as well as the causes, consequences, solutions, definitions, facts and tipping points related to these subjects, click here
 
To see our most current positions, opinions, comments, agreement or disagreement with this article, and/or possible criticisms related to the subjects or facts raised in the above article, click here.  Then look for those subjects in the navigation links at the top the page.
 
To sign a critical petition for declaring an international global warming State of Emergency, click  here!

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.