Video: Prochlorococcus is thought to be the most abundant photosynthetic organism---why don't we know more about it? Learn more: http://scim.ag/2lEoLp6
To look at, the object of her passion is just a green mote, floating in vast numbers in the world's oceans. But Chisholm has found hidden complexity within Prochlorococcus, a cyanobacterium that is the smallest, most abundant photosynthesizing cell in the ocean—responsible for 5% of global photosynthesis, by some estimates. Its many different versions, or ecotypes, thrive from the sunlit sea surface to a depth of 200 meters, where light is minimal. Collectively the "species" boasts an estimated 80,000 genes—four times what humans have, and plenty to deal with whatever the world's oceans throw at it. "It's a beautiful little life machine and like a superorganism," Chisholm says. "It's got a story to tell us."
And tell it Chisholm has, to anyone and in any way possible. Her work on the microbe has led to a meeting with a U.S. president, a debate with the Dalai Lama, and co-authorship of science-themed children's books. She even once tried to get the hip-hop star GZA to incorporate the bacterium's mouthful of a name into a rap song for an album he was considering on oceans. "She's really driven to sell Prochlorococcus," says Allison Coe, Chisholm's longtime lab manager. "She wants everyone else to be as passionate and to consider it as amazing as she thinks it is."
The microbe's long climb to recognition mirrors Chisholm's own. Early in her career, as the lone woman, and lone biologist, in the civil engineering department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, she had to overcome both scientific and cultural hurdles, adopting the latest techniques to reveal Prochlorococcus's secrets while working with other female faculty to get MIT to address gender discrimination. Her quiet persistence inspired others. Chisholm, who in recent years has been awarded the National Medal of Science and named as one of MIT's 13 Institute Professors, sent "an important message for future academicians," says Heidi Sosik, a biological oceanographer at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) in Massachusetts. "You don't have to be a blustery, high-profile white guy to make it."
The stature of her microbial partner continues to grow as well. Its influence over climate is now appreciated, for example. And Chisholm and two colleagues will soon lay out evidence for a scenario in which Prochlorococcus is a central actor in evolution. They propose that it is not only responsible for much of the oxygen we breathe today, but also fueled the explosion of early life in the oceans and the ancient rise in oxygen in Earth's atmosphere. As MIT oceanographer Mick Follows put it, Chisholm "has beautifully shown us how this microbe works and how the ocean world is organized."
A microbe's vital stats
Chisholm says that as a woman of her times, she went to college in the 1960s mainly "to find a husband." Nevertheless, as an undergrad, she explored the chemistry of lakes, and—after a professor pushed her—decided to pursue a Ph.D. At the State University of New York in Albany, she studied the 24-hour variation in nutrient cycling in Euglena, a single-cell photosynthesizer like Prochlorococcus, but found in freshwater. She next went to the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, California, for a very practical reason—there was more funding for marine microbial ecology than for freshwater.
In 1976, MIT came calling. At the time, its civil engineering department was looking to become more "environmental" by hiring a microbiologist, a trend already evident in many similar departments elsewhere. She accepted but was so convinced she wouldn't get tenure it took many years for her to consider buying a house. It was easy to see why she might not fit in. An old department photo shows a petite, young blonde among a sea of mostly middle-aged white men. Furthermore, the other biologists on campus had a biomedical or molecular bent, quite unlike the fuzzy ecological world she was diving into.
But MIT, through its affiliation with WHOI on Cape Cod, offered Chisholm a chance to go to sea, looking for answers to a question that had begun to captivate her: how microbes influence the ocean. "She had this idea there were new things to discover and [scientists] just needed to find ways of observing the ocean at higher and higher resolution," says Alexandra Worden of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute in Moss Landing, California, who studies the evolution of ocean microbes.
In the 1980s most of the ocean's freefloating organisms, or plankton, went virtually unseen because they were too small to detect in a light microscope. But other researchers had identified a handful of photosynthetic marine bacteria. Chisholm and her first postdoc Robert Olson decided to sieve seawater with a flow cytometer, a laboratory device that uses a laser to view and sort individual cells, to learn more about them. With it, Olson noticed an unexpected red fluorescing signal so small that they first thought it was electronic noise. But the signal varied depending on the depth and temperature of the water sample being analyzed, suggesting it might come from something alive.
Chisholm wasn't satisfied that they had found a new life form until collaborators photographed the tiny cells under an electron microscope and another group had traced the red signal to the microbe's chlorophyll and other pigments. In 1988, they published their discovery. By 1992, when they named it Prochlorococcus, the "primitive green berry," they realized that they were not the first to see the microbe. But no one had recognized that it represented a new organism. "We were in the right place at the right time with the right instruments to have these cells say who they were," Chisholm says.
For years, because no one could keep Prochlorococcus alive in a lab, the only way to study it was at sea. And even though Brian Palenik, now an oceanographer at Scripps, was finally able to grow it in a test tube in 1990, it took another 10 years before anyone could sustain the pure cultures needed for many experiments. Even today, no one has been able to manipulate Prochlorococcus genetically, a standard approach to studying other organisms.
Despite these challenges, Chisholm was quickly seduced by her team's discovery, suspecting that this simple, abundant organism might be a major player in marine ecology. But just as her relationship with Prochlorococcus was starting to flourish, Chisholm took a detour onto a more public stage, after receiving a call that, she says, "changed my life." Nancy Hopkins, an MIT cancer researcher she casually knew, felt that the school was discriminating against female faculty in lab space, pay, and support. Hopkins had written a letter calling for an investigation and wanted more backers. Chisholm had never considered herself a feminist or activist, but like all but one of the 17 other senior female faculty at the time, she signed on. "We were really upset that things were not changing for women," Chisholm recalls.
They took their concerns to an MIT dean in 1995 and got backing for an investigative committee to collect data on the number of teaching and administrative positions held by women, salaries, sizes of labs, and more. "[Penny] was one of the ones who brought a more positive, ‘Let's figure this out’ approach," says biogeochemist Diane McKnight of the University of Colorado in Boulder, an alumna of Chisholm's lab.
After working behind the scenes for almost 2 years, the committee made a series of recommendations that the MIT administration quickly embraced. When a summary of the investigation made it into the media in 1999, "it was a shot heard around the world," Chisholm recalls. "It became a big movement." MIT's leaders responded constructively, she adds. "Looking back at the way things were when I first got here and how things are now, there's a tremendous shift," she says.
After helping raise the profile of female scientists, Chisholm drew new attention to her favorite microbe. As she and her students and postdocs grew samples under varied conditions in the lab, they identified five main Prochlorococcus ecotypes, each adapted to a different combination of light and temperature. In her lab's growth chambers, they are easy to tell apart: Some are bright green, whereas others have a yellowish hue. Each makes a different light-absorbing pigment so that at its particular depth, "it is the most efficient photosynthetic machine," Chisholm says.
When the U.S. Department of Energy's Joint Genome Institute first began sequencing microbes in 2003, Chisholm convinced it to sequence two Prochlorococcus strains—this at a time when sequencing a single microbe was a big deal—so she could assess genetic differences between the forms adapted to low and high light levels. "That was very greedy of me," she smiles. Her team found the high light–adapted ecotype's genome was very streamlined—1.7 million bases with just 1700 genes. "It's one of, if not the, simplest self-sustaining organism we know of," says Chisholm's postdoc Jamie Becker. The low-light version's genome has 2.4 million bases, with 2275 genes, including some that may enable the microbe to work best in low light and avoid damage from the sun should it wind up at the surface somehow.
As new molecular technologies arose—microarrays that document gene activity and proteomics methods that look at the proteins present, for example—Chisholm and her students and postdocs were quick to learn and apply them. She credits them for all her successes. "When I say ‘we’ I mean ‘they,’" she remarked at a lecture on her life's work. When undergraduate Jed Fuhrman worked in her lab and contributed to a paper published in Nature, "she had no trouble just handing off the first authorship even though she was a new professor" and wrote most of the paper, he recalls. (Fuhrman is now a biological oceanographer at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles.)
Together, her lab found that each of the main Prochlorococcus ecotypes has its own genomic "island," a patch of genes that confers specific adaptations to an environment. One island helps the microbe survive in very low-phosphorus waters, for example. Bacteriophages, viruses that infect bacteria and can either pick up or deposit genetic material, may move these islands and other genes between ecotypes, Chisholm's postdoc Debbie Lindell proposed in 2004, thereby ensuring the microbes can adapt to changing conditions.
Chisholm's lab remained small until about 15 years ago, when the mounting evidence that ocean microbes are major players in the biosphere persuaded three foundations—Seaver, Gordon and Betty Moore, and Simons—to pour millions into studying them. The lab grew from a handful of researchers to dozens, who not only could spend weeks at sea, sampling and collecting data, but could also return to the lab to try innovative ways of probing how the microbe worked. "That's when everything got exciting," Chisholm says.
The worldwide sampling showed that the five primary ecotypes didn't begin to capture Prochlorococcus's diversity. Sequencing revealed hundreds of strains coexisting even in just a milliliter of seawater, each with more than 100 distinctive genes. And when it became possible to sequence genomes from single cells—a technique Chisholm's lab pioneered for marine microbes—each strain turned out to encompass still more genetic variation. "It's not one bug, it's a whole family of things that grade into each other," says Olson, now at WHOI.
Although each cell has only about 2000 genes, Prochlorococcus as a whole has a "pan-genome" of perhaps 80,000 genes, Chisholm and her colleagues estimate. "That's a ton of information for these little guys," she says, and it must be the secret of Prochlorococcus's success. Its enormous genomic repertoire enables it to cope with conditions across a vast swath of the oceans, dominating warm seas from 40° North to 40° South (see map, below).
The sea's invisible pasture
Drawing on ocean and marine microbe data collected by Massachusetts Institute of Technology researchers, this model depicts the most dominant types of phytoplankton in the world's oceans, with Prochlorococcus ruling much of the globe and bigger diatoms dominating nearer the poles.
These waters contain an estimated 3 billion billion billion Prochlorococcus cells, collectively weighing as much as 220 million Volkswagen Beetles. That abundance makes the microbe a heavyweight in ocean food webs and climate. It is a key source of food in the nutrient-poor regions of the ocean where it flourishes, Becker says. "Prochlorococcus makes organic matter that other microorganisms eat." And because of its role in the carbon cycle, the microbe significantly regulates levels of climate-warming carbon dioxide (CO2), Chisholm says.
Yet Chisholm is uncomfortable with proposals to stem global warming by manipulating the ocean's life to capture more CO2. In 2001, she vigorously spoke out against proposals to fertilize the oceans with iron to stimulate phytoplankton growth, coauthoring a paper in Science that warned of possible unforeseen consequences. Years later, in 2012, she publicly debated the Dalai Lama's "let's try it" position when the two were on a panel at MIT.
Despite her current visibility, Chisholm still feels much of the insecurity that burdened her early in her career. When she was named an Institute Professor, for example, she wondered, "How could this be?" she recalls. "I don't feel like that kind of person."
A sense of being an imposter, she admits, continues to dog her. She still works long hours—"I could never juggle [so] many things," Coe says. "But the older she gets the more worried she gets." In 2013, Chisholm's anxiety about the lab and the future of her Prochlorococcus cultures if she retires was so palpable she began to develop minor health problems. Starting tai chi lessons gave her a new perspective. "I needed to do something to get me out of my head," she recalls. She has also found an outlet, with artist and author Molly Bang, writing children's science books, featuring the sun as the narrator. One tells the story of the "invisible pasture of the sea."
She continues to be driven to unravel the story of Prochlorococcus. In 2014, for example, electron micrographs taken in her lab revealed tiny vesicles budding off Prochlorococcus cells; later, her postdoc Steven Biller showed that each cell releases two to five lipid-membrane bubbles filled with DNA and RNA per generation—possible food sources for other plankton, decoys for viruses, gene-transfer vehicles, or even messengers that communicate with other microbes. Biller has since found that other marine bacteria make these vesicles as well. "This was a whole new feature of the ocean ecosystem," Chisholm says.
In another hint that Prochlorococcus builds extensive partnerships with other marine microbes, Chisholm's lab found that it secretes a broad variety of peptides, or short protein fragments, that in other organisms have antimicrobial or signaling activity. Prochlorococcus has as many as 1500 different peptides per cell, according to work by Andres Fernando Cubillos-Ruiz, now a postdoc at MIT in another lab. The peptides appear to provide food for other very abundant ocean microbes and some of those in turn secrete an enzyme that detoxifies reactive oxygen molecules. Prochlorococcus doesn't make that enzyme itself but may be able to take it in from the surrounding water. The peptides may also signal other microbes in the surrounding waters—although what messages they carry is unclear. "I continue to be humbled by the major things we learn from Prochlorococcus that change the way we think about oceans," Chisholm says.
The tiny, mighty bacterium could also change thinking about life on land. Chisholm's postdoc Rogier Braakman has pieced together Prochlorococcus's evolutionary history, drawing on the genes active in different ecotypes and the conditions in which they live. Braakman is examining whether the microbe's metabolic activity hundreds of millions of years ago could have helped pave the way for life to explode outside of the oceans by drawing down atmospheric carbon dioxide and increasing oxygen in the air. This scenario has plenty of questions, Chisholm says, but its potential importance "makes it worth spending the time to connect the dots."
At 68, she is eager to keep making those connections. "I should probably be thinking about retiring, but I'm not because Prochlorococcus is too darn interesting," Chisholm says. "I'm really very grateful to have this organism in my life."
Mar. 9, 2017 , 8:00 AM
Sign up for the Global Warming Blog for free by clicking here. In your email you will receive critical news, research and the warning signs for the next global warming disaster.
Click here to learn how global warming has become irreversible and what you can do to protect your family and assets.
To share this blog post: Go to the original shorter version of this post. Look to lower right for the large green Share button.
To view our current agreement or disagreement with this blog article, click here.