Toon of the Week...
Story of the Week...
see video above...
Arctic sea ice summer minimum in 2017 is eighth lowest on record by Daisy Dunne & Robert McSweeney, Carbon Brief, Sep 20, 2017
We Charted Arctic Sea Ice for Nearly Every Day Since 1979. You’ll See a Trend. by Nadja Popovich, Henry Fountain & Adam Pearce, New York Times, Sep 22, 2017
Video of the Week...
The World's Soaring CO2 Levels Visualized as Skyscrapers
If you want an unusual but punchy telling of the world’s explosion of climate-warping gases, look no further than this visualization of CO2 levels over the past centuries soaring like skyscrapers into space.
“A Brief History of CO2 Emissions” portrays the cumulative amount of this common greenhouse gas that humans have produced since the mid-1700s. It also projects to the end of the 21st century to show what might happen if the world disregards the Paris Agreement, an ambitious effort to limit warming that 200 countries signed onto in 2015. (President Donald Trump still wants to renege on it.) At this point, the CO2-plagued atmosphere could see jumps in average temperature as high as 6 to 9 degrees Fahrenheit, the animation’s narrator warns, displaying a model of Earth looking less like planet than porcupine.
“We wanted to show where and when CO2 was emitted in the last 250 years—and might be emitted in the coming 80 years if no climate action is taken,” emails Boris Mueller, a creator of the viz along with designer Julian Braun and others at Germany’s University of Applied Sciences Potsdam and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. “By visualizing the global distribution and the local amount of cumulated CO2, we were able to create a strong image that demonstrates very clearly the dominant CO2-emitting regions and time spans.”
The World's Soaring CO2 Levels Visualized as Skyscrapers by John Metcalf, City Lab, Sep 19, 2017
SkS in the News...
A key paragraph in Tim Harford's Fatal attraction of fake facts sours political debate (Financial Times)...
Researchers have been studying the problem for years, after noting how easily charlatans could debase the discussion of smoking, vaccination and climate change. A good starting point is The Debunking Handbook by John Cook and Stephan Lewandowsky, which summarises a dispiriting set of discoveries.
Stephanie Keep's Commentary: Unsolicited and Unwelcome, Climate Denial Comes to Schools (PBS Nova Education - Science of Learning) includes a link to the Intermediate version of the SkS Rebuttal article, The 97% consensus on global warming. The following graphic is also included.
In his article, Consensus On Climate Change (The Gleaner, Jamaica, West Indies), A. Anthony Chen writes:
Let me start by stating a very crucial piece of statistics: 97 per cent of the experts on climate change, the climate-change scientists themselves, agree that humans have been the main cause of climate change since the 1950s. (See, e.g.), Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming, by John Cook, et al, in Environmental Research Letters. This consensus is different from another survey that used non-experts such as economic geologists and a self-selected group of those who reject the consensus.)
Regan Wilson also cites Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming in her article, Climate change contributes to Hurricane Irma posted in the Quad, the student newspaper of the West Chester University of Pennsylvania.
The Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) is an inter-disciplinary committee of the International Council for Science (ICSU), and was created in 1958. SCAR is charged with initiating, developing and coordinating high quality international scientific research in the Antarctic region (including the Southern Ocean), and on the role of the Antarctic region in the Earth system. SCAR provides objective and independent scientific advice to the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings and other organizations such as the UNFCCC and IPCC on issues of science and conservation affecting the management of Antarctica and the Southern Ocean and on the role of the Antarctic region in the Earth system. Learn more about us and what activities are on the horizon.
Coming Soon on SkS...
- The Mail's censure reveals conservative media bias on climate change (Dana)
- Factcheck: Mail on Sunday’s ‘astonishing evidence’ about global temperature rise (Zeke Hausfather)
- Guest Post (John Abraham)
- Right-wing media could not be more wrong about the 1.5°C carbon budget paper (Dana)
- New research, September 11-17, 2017 (Ari)
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #39 (John Hartz)
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Waming Digest #39 (John Hartz)
Poster of the Week...
Climate Feedback Reviews...
Climate Feedback asked its network of scientists to review the article, Analysis of Climate Scientists: Climate Models Have Overestimated Global Warming by James Barrett. The Daily Wire, Sep 19, 2017
Four scientists analyzed the article and estimated its overall scientific credibility to be ‘very low’.
This story at The Daily Wire describes a new study that evaluates the remaining amount of greenhouse gas that we can emit before global temperature rises to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial times. The study suggests that we may have a little more room in the so-called “carbon budget” than previously estimated.
Scientists who reviewed the Daily Wire article found that it greatly misinterpreted the study by saying that it showed that climate projections have overestimated warming. This is incorrect. The study does not conclude that climate models are overly sensitive to warming, or that future warming will be less than projected. Instead, it investigates a discrepancy between the total amount of greenhouse gas emitted since the Industrial Revolution in the models and in the real world. This difference in estimated past emissions affects the study’s calculation of the remaining “carbon budget” for future emissions.
According to the study’s authors, articles implying their work “indicates that global temperatures are not rising as fast as predicted” (as published in Fox News, The Telegraph, The Daily Mail, Breitbart…) do not represent their work. Describing the inaccurate coverage of their study, two of the authors wrote, “Crucially, the reason for the correction [of the carbon budget] was not that we had a new estimate of the climate response, or warming per tonne of CO2 emitted—we used exactly the current consensus range—but that we took better account of past emissions and where human-induced warming has got to already.”
Daily Wire article misunderstands study on carbon budget (along with Fox News, The Telegraph, The Daily Mail, Breitbart…), Climate Feedback, Sep 21, 2017
SkS Week in Review...
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #38 by John Hartz
- New research, September 11-17, 2017 by Ari Jokimäki, Skeptical Science
- Remembering our dear friend Andy Skuce by Dana Nucitelli
- It takes just 4 years to detect human warming of the oceans by John Abraham (Climate Consensus - the 97%, Guardian)
- Australia's Transition to Renewable Energy by Riduna
- Scientific models saved lives from Harvey and Irma. They can from climate change too by Dana Nuccitelli (Climate Consensus - the 97%, Guardian)
- 2017 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #37 by John Hartz
97 Hours of Consensus...
Quote derived with author's permission from:
"We know that the world is warming, we've known that for a long time. We know that much of that warming, in fact the overwhelming majority of that warming is due to human activity, that is the combustion of fossil fuels and other GHGs going into the atmosphere."
Posted on 24 September 2017 by John Hartz
original story HERE
Share This Blog Post: If you would like to share this blog post, go to the original shorter version of this post and look to lower right for the large green Share button. Ask them to sign up too for the Global Warming Blog.