The United Kingdom aims to cut its carbon emissions 80 percent from 1990 levels by 2050, and scientists think farmers can play a key role in achieving that target...

A new study finds that if farmers can increase their yields, use less land for crops and livestock, and restore some woodlands and wetlands, they can reduce their emissions 80 percent.

“Land is a source of greenhouse gases if it is used to farm fertilizer-hungry crops or methane-producing cattle, or it can be a sink for greenhouse gases through sequestration,” said Andrew Balmford, a professor of conservation science at Cambridge University. Balmford led the study, published Monday the journal Nature Climate Change, that is the first to look at how land restoration can offset carbon pollution on a nationwide scale.

“If we increase woodland and wetland, those lands will be storing carbon in trees, photosynthesizing it in reeds, and shunting it down into soils,” Balmford said, adding that the restored landscapes would allow native plants and wildlife to repopulate the regions.

About 70 percent of the U.K. is designated for agriculture, and the farmers are responsible for nearly 10 percent of the country’s annual greenhouse gas emissions. Food consumption is expected to increase as much as 38 percent by 2050.

The challenge is to achieve the legally binding carbon cuts laid out in the U.K.’s Climate Change Act without increasing reliance on imported food.

Balmford said the researchers consulted with crop and livestock experts to come up with the best potential options to increase crop yields by 2050.  

“They would require a substantial increase in agriculture research and development, but the yield increases we modeled were all considered technically feasible by 2050 by the panel of crop and livestock experts we consulted,” Balmford said.

The most promising areas highlighted in the study include developing improved crops capable of capturing more nutrients from fertilizers and that are more efficient at using water for photosynthesis.

If crop yields are increased, the area needed for food production can decrease, and carbon-storing trees and natural wetlands can take their place.

In a best-case scenario, the study estimated crop yield increases of increases of 1.3 percent per year, which could free up as much as 30 to 40 percent of the U.K.’s current farmed land.

RELATED: Forests Can Feed Billions, but Only If They’re Left Standing

If that land was then used to grow the U.K.’s current forest cover from 12 percent to 30 percent, and restore 2,700 square miles of peatlands, agriculture could reduce emissions 80 percent by 2050.

Balmford said the key to is to encourage farmers to not just abandon land, but to replant it.

“Active planting would generate greater climate mitigation and biodiversity gains than simply abandoning farming,” Balmford said. “Landowners would have to be incentivized to a  this on, which would require significant redirection of existing agricultural subsidy schemes. These changes would take time.”

The study emphasizes to achieve that goal will require a mixture of crop yield increases and land restoration, along with a reduction in food waste and meat consumption.

“Reducing meat consumption appears to offer greater mitigation potential than reducing food waste, but more importantly, our results highlight the benefits of combining measures,” Balmford said. “For example, coupling even moderate yield growth with land sparing and reductions in meat consumption has the technical potential to surpass an 80 percent reduction in net emissions.”

Related stories on TakePart:


How to Cut Deforestation in Half to Save the Climate

U.K. Renewables Beat Coal Power for the First Time Ever

Your Carbon Emissions May End Up Starving Poor People in Africa


To receive the latest breaking news on global warming issues, click here and go to our climate blog. Look to the bottom right of the page for the climate blog Subscribe box to automatically get our RSS news feed and each new story. 
To learn what you can do that is effective to help fix global warming caused climate destabilizationclick here.
To learn why the term climate destabilization is replacing the terms climate change and global warming, click here.

To help do something about the climate change and global warming emergency, click here.

Sign up for our free Global Warming Blog by clicking here. (In your email, you will receive critical news, research, and the warning signs for the next global warming disaster.)

To share this blog post: Go to the Share button to the left below.

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
Get More Info Here Take Action Support Our Mission

Subscribe to Our Global Warming Blog


Subscribe to Our Global Warming Blog