Governor Jerry Brown of California said the proposed legislation: “This plan gets us the most bang for the buck.”
SACRAMENTO — California Democrats are taking further steps to advance the state’s ambitious climate-change agenda, agreeing to regulate methane emissions from landfills and dairy farms for the first time and approving $900 million in spending on environmental programs...
The approval came in the final hours of the two-year legislative session Wednesday following a flurry of negotiations involving Governor Jerry Brown, Democratic legislative leaders, and the affected industries.
The legislation, which now heads to the Democratic governor’s desk, would require steep reductions in a variety of climate-changing gases known as short-lived climate pollutants, including methane, HFC gases used in aerosols and air conditioning refrigerants, and soot, known as black carbon. While these pollutants live in the atmosphere for relatively short periods, they have an outsize impact on climate change, according to legislative researchers.
‘‘With this bill we prove again that California doesn’t shy away from tackling major climate change legislation — we lead,’’ said Senator Ricardo Lara, of Bell Gardens, a Democrat who wrote the bill and brokered the compromise with the dairy industry.
The compromise package, tied to $50 million in methane emissions funding, would set a requirement that dairies and livestock producers reduce methane emissions from manure to 40 percent below their 2013 levels by 2030. It allows for the regulation of cow flatulence — another source of methane emissions — if experts determine that technology exists to reduce it.
California would also be pushed to significantly increase composting in order to reduce organic waste, which emits greenhouse gases when it breaks down in landfills. The legistlation sets a goal of reducing the flow of food products to landfills by 50 percent within four years.
While the bill has the support of some environmental groups, others were angry that Lara made concessions to ease the transition for the dairy industry, including a delay in implementation until 2024.
‘‘It’s important that we reduce emissions of these super-pollutants rapidly,’’ said Bill Magavern, policy director for the Coalition for Clean Air, which initially supported Lara’s proposal but dropped its support once the changes were made.
Lawmakers also approved a $900 million spending package that for environmental programs, agreeing to spend nearly two-thirds of the available money generated by the state’s cap on carbon pollution under a deal between the Democratic governor and top Democratic legislative leaders.
The deal includes $363 million for clean vehicle incentives and hundreds of millions for urban plants and efforts to create cleaner air in disadvantaged communities. It also includes $50 million to reduce emissions of methane and other climate-changing gases associated with dairy production and another $40 million for landfills.
‘‘This plan gets us the most bang for the buck,’’ Brown said in a statement. ‘‘It directs hundreds of millions where it’s needed most — to help disadvantaged communities, curb dangerous super pollutants and cut petroleum use - while saving some for the future.’’
The compromise ends two years of indecision over what to do with $1.4 billion in revenues collected from California’s fee on polluters, known as cap-and-trade.
About 60 percent of program revenues are earmarked for specific projects including high-speed rail. The spending announced Wednesday covers the remaining 40 percent and also leaves $462 million for future years.
Senate President Kevin De Leon had proposed spending nearly all the available funds. Speaker Anthony Rendon and Brown advocated a more frugal approach, particularly given plummeting revenue and uncertainty about the program’s long-term viability.
Pollution permits consistently sold out after the cap-and-trade program began in 2012, regularly generating billions of dollars to combat climate change. But demand this year has plummeted amid a legal challenge that threatens to end the program.
Republicans have consistently opposed the program as an illegal tax and rejected the spending plan Wednesday.
“The money goes to many Democrat pet projects throughout the state at the expense of wildfire prevention issues and pursues long-term greenhouse gas reduction goals that will continue to harm families and jobs,’’ said Senator Jeff Stone, a Temecula Republican.
By Jonathan J. Cooper Associated Press September 02, 2016
original story HERE
Share This Blog Post: If you would like to share this blog post, go to the original shorter version of this post and look to lower right for the large green Share button. Ask them to sign up too for the Global Warming Blog.