Our Policy of Necessary Disruption


We are in a global warming extinction emergency. In a state of emergency, one has little time left to act and fix the crisis. Therefore, we must operate at levels of true urgency and direct peaceful and legal intervention not utilized before, which are commensurate with the larger dangers we face to ensure the global warming emergency and its interdependent crises will get resolved.

The Job One for Humanity organization has adapted to the new reality that we are in a global warming extinction emergency and many severe global warming consequences that are now unavoidable. While we can no longer still avoid the extinction of much of humanity by mid-century (because of our previous delays in acting effectively), we still have a slight chance to prevent the near-total or total extinction of humanity due to accelerating global warming and the other 11 global crisis we face.

We can do this, but only if we act immediately and speak the painful new truths of the emergency we all face. There is no collective escape if we fail!

Therefore, we are compelled to disrupt because the last remaining window of opportunity until 2025 to realistically prevent a near-total or total extinction event from occurring long before 2100 is limited. (We have only until about 2025 to make the critical global fossil fuel reductions due to the inertia and momentum factors in the climate system).

Accordingly, we have become a necessary disruptor of any individual, company, not-for-profit environmental group, or any global warming educational peers who unintentionally or intentionally present false, misleading, diminishing, or significantly underestimated global warming information about the real dangers and deadlines of our global warming extinction emergency!

We do this because anyone presenting false, misleading, diminishing, or significantly underestimated global warming information about the real dangers and deadlines of our global warming extinction emergency hides the real global warming danger and urgency from society. They do this by making society think that the problem is being correctly solved or we are making the correct progress when both assumptions are incorrect. Because society thinks things are ok or progress is being made, society does little to nothing when immediate radical changes are needed to avert real deadlines and tipping points.

What exactly do we mean by necessary disruptor?

A. Being a disruptor means that in peaceful, legal, and nonviolent ways, we will publicly challenge any organization or individual that presents false, significantly underestimated, diminishing, or misleading global warming analysis, facts or solutions or, otherwise misrepresent, dummy down or "markets" global warming information in such a way that it becomes counter-productive to resolving the true urgency of resolving the global warming extinction emergency

We will disrupt this flow of false, underestimated, or misleading information wherever we find it to the best of our organization's abilities and resources. 

B. Being a disruptor also means that we hold that no well-intended or global warming ill-informed organization or individual has ANY inherent right to forward incorrect, underestimated, or misleading information unchallenged when their actions and these ideas lessen either the urgency or the effective means of resolving our global warming extinction emergency.

Our unwelcome role as a necessary disruptor is not just needed; it is required! Any distress that we might cause by challenging any offending organization or individual is infinitely less when compared to the suffering, death, and damage that such unchallenged incorrect information could or will eventually cause to the world's efforts to reduce global warming in time to save humanity and the future.

We will also try to be respectful whenever possible

We will take this posture whenever possible, especially where we can see the individuals, companies, and nonprofit organizations are composed of good people and have previously done many good things for global warming education. 

In some cases, these same entities also may have made essential or significant contributions to the global warming educational movement over many years. While we will recognize and honor the many good actions they have done in the past, we cannot stand with any current action or information that directly or indirectly threatens resolving the global warming extinction emergency and saving humanity's future.

We also understand that in many cases, organizations and individuals are probably not presenting false, underestimated, diminishing, or misleading global warming analysis or facts counter-productive to resolving the global warming extinction emergency awarely or intentionally. They are doing the best they can with what they have studied or understood on this very complex issue.

We believe that when individuals or organizations have unintentionally presented incorrect or underestimated global warming analysis or facts or that they have misrepresented other important global warming information, it is often because they have:

1. Failed to challenge the existing:

a. "authority endorsed" paradigms and computer models of global warming futures, 

b. used popular "its good for the economy" endorsed analysis and interpretations for missing critical inputs, 

c. allowed hidden political manipulation or manipulation by other hidden for-profit vested interests (the fossil fuel industry) that have skewed or warped the integrity of other honest climate researchers' results. 

2. Listened to marketing people within their organizations, causing them to self-censor and treat their members like children who cannot be told or deal with the many worsening and painful facts of the global warming extinction emergency.

3. Failed to have any single individual or senior executive group within their organization put in the tens of thousands of pages of challenging climate research reading with the requisite mensa level IQ, math, and physics grasp, as well as a deep requisite understanding of complex adaptive systems, tipping point theory, systems theory, and an adequate dialectical meta-systemic thinking system understanding of one of the most complicated issues of our time.

In Summary

Our organization will be necessarily disruptive of the incorrect facts, false beliefs, and ineffective global warming reduction plans of anyone presenting them. We do this only to call attention to more effective actions or more useful global warming facts and analyses.

When you read our website and see us enacting our necessary disruptor policy, please also keep in mind that our global government leaders have utterly failed to see the coming pain and suffering of the massive COVID-19 pandemic or still adequately manage it, nor did they sufficiently prepare for it even though they knew they had been warned about it long ago!

Our government, business, and even many environmental leaders are also not seeing, preparing for, or preventing the global warming extinction emergency, which is already happening and will be far worse than COVID-19!

Because of our governments' ongoing gross extinction-level threat inaction, we must find ways to compensate for that failure. Necessary disruption is a vital tool to do so.

We promise

We will provide valuable and accurate information on the global warming state of emergency. This way, we can more quickly reduce global fossil fuel use to the 2025 targets by executing all of the prioritized and deadline-driven actions necessary to prevent a global warming-driven total extinction event because:

a. The faster and more we reduce global fossil fuel use, the more people will survive to carry on humanity. 

b. The quicker and more we reduce global fossil fuel use, the fewer future generations will suffer from an ever-increasing sequence of escalating global warming catastrophes.

We believe that everyone has the right to their own opinion. However, we also think that any organization or person can and should be publicly challenged if the result(s) of their unchallenged views will cause grave harm to others and the future of humanity and the biosphere!

Therefore, if anyone, particularly in public positions of influence, is forwarding incorrect, underestimated, diminishing, or misleading ideas that will make it more difficult to slow or resolve the global warming extinction emergency, we will:

internally honor and recognize all of their legitimate accomplishments and, we will publicly attack the errors in the information they are presenting in the public forums that will provide the most corrective benefits and most disrupt the status quo of their erroneous educational actions.

We do not seek to polarize or lessen the efforts of any individual or organization seeking to educate about global warming. Still, at the twelfth hour of this greatest of all human extinction emergencies, we can not and will not allow dangerous incorrect, underestimated, diminishing, or misleading ideas about the global warming extinction emergency to go unchallenged.

If you doubt why this necessary disruption policy is so important, with so little time left to solve the global warming and related emergencies, please click here and see where we are today with the global warming emergency and our other world crises.

We must protect the futures of generations X, Y, and Z. If it means peaceful, corrective, necessary disruption, so be it. 


The Job One for Humanity Team

PS So that you know, the main goals of our not-for-profit organization are found here.


Please see this article for some of the ways we are respectfully disrupting.



Showing 4 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Dexter Wollersheim
    commented 2019-07-26 12:36:20 -0700
    Thank you Bruce.

    All we are really battling is ignorance.

    And, thanks for any support that you are willing to share with the organization.

    The Job One team
  • Bruce Audley
    commented 2019-07-25 18:02:00 -0700
    I love this approach! I have followed for years when I used factnet.org to battle Rapport Leadership International. The climate issue has escaped my interest but this policy statement resonates in its civility. The battle needs this approach. I will send a donation to help with this cause.
  • Bruce Audley
    followed this page 2019-07-25 17:45:54 -0700
  • Dexter Wollersheim
    published this page in About 2019-07-19 15:33:46 -0700
Get More Info Here Take Action Support Our Mission

Subscribe to Our Global Warming Blog


Subscribe to Our Global Warming Blog