Job One for Humanity is a nonprofit global warming educational organization

For the fastest response to all inquiries, please email us at: [email protected]

Contact Information

Mailing address:  

Job One For Humanity, 

PMB 2167, 

1650 Casino Dr.

Laughlin, Nevada 89029

Job One for Humanity is a nonprofit global warming educational organization committed to implementing the Job One for Humanity Plan that will allow us to survive the global warming emergency. Job One for Humanity has been a partner organization with other online nonprofit educational and environmental organizations since 2008. 

See the Job One for Humanity Mission

See the Job One History

See the Job One for Humanity Plan

See the 16 Benefits of Global Warming

See our Take Action page to find out what you can do to help re-stabilize Earth’s climate.

See Global Warming Explained

See Climate Destabilization Explained

Sea Climate Tipping Points Explained

Showing 8 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Pierre Cochet-Weinandt
    commented 2023-06-30 06:24:39 -0700
    I assume that you read the abstract from NASA of James Hansen’s new report titled “Global Warming in the Pipeline.” Here it is:

    “Improved knowledge of glacial-to-interglacial global temperature change implies that fast-feedback equilibrium climate sensitivity is at least ∼4°C for doubled CO2 (2×CO2), with likely range 3.5-5.5°C. Greenhouse gas (GHG) climate forcing is 4.1 W/m2 larger in 2021 than in 1750, equivalent to 2%times$CO2 forcing. Global warming in the pipeline is greater than prior estimates. Eventual global warming due to today’s GHG forcing alone — after slow feedbacks operate — is about 10°C. Human-made aerosols are a major climate forcing, mainly via their effect on clouds. We infer from paleoclimate data that aerosol cooling offset GHG warming for several millennia as civilization developed. A hinge-point in global warming occurred in 1970 as increased GHG warming outpaced aerosol cooling, leading to global warming of 0.18°C per decade. Aerosol cooling is larger than estimated in the current IPCC report, but it has declined since 2010 because of aerosol reductions in China and shipping. Without unprecedented global actions to reduce GHG growth, 2010 could be another hinge point, with global warming in following decades 50-100% greater than in the prior 40 years. The enormity of consequences of warming in the pipeline demands a new approach addressing legacy and future emissions. The essential requirement to “save” young people and future generations is return to Holocene-level global temperature."

    Job One for Humanity had a book review section, comprising climate fiction books. I read Eat the Moon on your advice. I believe that fiction literature is a very appropriate medium to reach a larger public, touching the emotions and addressing the personal consequences of global warming in real life. I wrote such a book, Mona, under the name Adam Flint, which is published on Amazon. I would gladly send you the book for your review. More generally, and apart from my own book, I think that it is essential to break the escapist loop modern fiction literature has locked itself in (mostly due to the policy of the “Big Five” publishers).
  • Denis Chupleshkin
    commented 2021-05-01 03:34:38 -0700
    The whole world was bewitched !!!! They conjure directly from Orthodox churches !!!!! Do something but rather !!!!! Otherwise, a nuclear war will start soon !!!!! Occult priests in the Russian Orthodox Church, the Moscow Patriarchate, the Nizhny Novgorod Metropolitanate, the Gorodets Diocese bishop Augustine Gorodets and Vetluges
  • Ivan Queiroz
    commented 2021-04-22 05:55:40 -0700
    I have new technology for producing energy without fuel. Contact us for more details 55 11 977756964 whatsapp
    Ivan Queiros – São Paulo – SP – Brazil
  • Lawrence Wollersheim
    commented 2019-10-25 08:52:31 -0700
    Hi Paul,

    Have you read the tipping point pages at



    And the Climageddon Scenario at

    These pages will lead you to many links on the science behind why the carbon 425 to 450 ppm area is our climate cliff.

    If after reading all of those materials with their science links you would still like more science links on the 425 to 450 ppm area, please let us know.

    We can send you more information on why, at that point, we will have “baked in” a temperature level that will trigger so many more tipping points, that for all intents and purposes, global warming goes out of our realistic control for the next 30 to 50 years.


    Thew Job One Team,
  • Paul Cooper
    commented 2019-10-25 02:22:01 -0700
    Hello. Please could you provide a link to the scientific backing of the 425 – 450 ppm CO2 climate cliff?
    I’m hoping you can do so.
  • Lawrence Wollersheim
    commented 2018-04-10 16:11:37 -0700
    Hi Charles,

    Thank you for your compliment and constructive criticisms.

    I will take your criticisms to heart and use them for updates for the new Climageddon version and hopefully they will also go up soon on the Job One website in this area,

    I would also ask you to go to and write a review on Climageddon as well. The more people we get reading Climageddon the greater chance we will get more people dealing with Global warming reality!

    I’m glad you like our Job One Plan approach in general. We are still tweaking the just updated Job One Plan which is found at

    Any help or suggestions you have in upgrading this plan would be deeply appreciated.

    You can email them directly to me at [email protected]


    Lawrence Wollersheim
  • Charles Shore
    commented 2018-04-08 13:01:06 -0700
    Mr. Wollersheim:

    Thank you so much for your highly elucidating work, Climageddon. You have certainly mastered the art of explaining complex scientific principles in basic English. I was particularly enlightened by your discussion of the cascading nature of tipping points, and am encouraged by the idea of targeting key players who would most effectively convey the message.
    However, I did have some concerns about several points. I hope that you will consider these issues in the spirit of constructive criticisms.
    1) In general, the book is too lengthy and repetitious. I believe that a condensed version, without features such as the Chapter Overviews, would have greater impact.

    2) Your statements regarding IPCC underestimations, on pages 188-189, are somewhat misleading. For example, in IPCC Scenario 2, the Agency indicates that the 3⁰ rise will occur by 2100. You further state that “At the 40% underestimation level, we will reach 4.2⁰ Celsius (7.5⁰ Fahrenheit) about 34 years sooner than they predict – at about 2066”. Yet you’re comparing the IPCC’s 3⁰ rise with your 4.2⁰ rise. Under your scenario, the time to reach a 3⁰ rise would be much sooner (based on a rough interpolation, I estimate that the 3⁰ scenario would play out around 2045).

    3) You make no mention of effects of population changes on your scenario. Are you assuming that the global population will continue to grow exponentially, reaching 10 billion around 2050? This assumption may not hold if massive numbers of climate-induced deaths occur. Under that scenario, the climate problem may become somewhat alleviated, as fewer individuals are emitting heat energy.

    4) Although you provide a comprehensive list of actionable items (Part 2, Chapter 3), I saw little discussion of how to successfully complete some of those actions. For example, I found no details on how to electrify our transportation system in 10 years. This complex project, which would require a confluence of engineering, political, and economic skills, is essential in fighting destabilization. Perhaps you thought that these types of implementation details are beyond the scope of the current work.

    I am a retired toxicologist, environmental scientist, and GIS Analyst who, since retirement, has been actively involved with several climate groups. I’ve found your approach to be the best fit for me, and am eager to get started. Is the Project Manager position still available? If so, please send me some further information on it, and I’ll be glad to provide detailed credentials.

    Charles O. Shore, MS
  • Ayman Abadear
    commented 2017-10-16 13:44:32 -0700
    i am inventor , i am very interested with the clean energy many inventions in clean energy ( H2O , MAGNATIC POWER , SUN POWER ) and my new invention is Treatment of global warming .

    i need to know who can support me to presenting my invention to save UK and
    europe,s future .
Get More Info Here Take Action Support Our Mission

Subscribe to Our Global Warming Blog


Subscribe to Our Global Warming Blog